The honest answer to "how much should we spend on marketing?" is that the percentage matters less than the discipline behind it. A well-spent smaller budget with clear tracking will beat a large one poured into channels you can't measure. What follows is a way to size the number sensibly, then decide where it goes.
Size the budget as a share of revenue — then sanity-check it
The common rule of thumb is to set marketing spend as a percentage of revenue, with a higher share when you're in growth or launch mode and a lower share when you're mature and mostly defending market share. Service businesses and B2B often sit at the lower end because a lot of their growth comes from referrals and reputation; consumer and e-commerce brands typically spend more because they're buying attention in competitive channels.
Don't treat any percentage as gospel. Two better questions are: what does it cost you to acquire a customer, and what is that customer worth over the life of the relationship? If you can acquire a customer for meaningfully less than they're worth, spending more is usually the right call. If you can't measure that yet, your first "marketing" investment is the tracking that lets you.
Split the budget between harvesting and creating demand
Think of your spend in two buckets. The first is harvesting existing demand — capturing people who are already looking for what you sell. That's search advertising, a website that ranks and converts, your Google Business Profile, and being easy to find and contact. This bucket usually has the clearest, fastest return, so it's where a cautious budget should go first.
The second is creating demand — building awareness among people who aren't searching yet. That's content, social, email nurture, PR, and brand. The return is slower and harder to attribute, but it's what stops you being permanently dependent on paid ads and what compounds over years. A sensible SME weighting leans toward harvesting early on, then shifts more toward demand creation as cash flow allows.
Don't underfund the foundations
Before you spend a dollar on ads, a few unglamorous things need to work, because they multiply everything downstream: a website that loads fast and makes the next step obvious, a way to capture and follow up enquiries promptly, and email you actually own (a list is an asset; a social following is rented). Paid traffic sent to a weak site is money set on fire. Fixing conversion is often the highest-return marketing work available, and it's a one-off rather than a recurring spend.
Insist on measurement, and cut what you can't trace
The single biggest lever for an SME budget is knowing which spend produced which enquiry. At minimum, ask every new lead how they found you and record it, set up conversion tracking on your website, and use call tracking if the phone is how people reach you. Review it monthly. The goal isn't a perfect attribution model — those don't exist for small businesses — it's enough signal to double down on what works and quietly stop what doesn't.
Be wary of spend that can never be measured and never seems to end: the sponsorship nobody can tie to a customer, the directory listing renewing on autopilot, the agency retainer with no reported outcomes. Some brand spend genuinely can't be tracked directly, and that's fine — but it should be a deliberate choice, not a default.
Build in room to test
Ring-fence a small slice of the budget for experiments — a new channel, a new offer, a new audience — on the understanding that most tests won't work and that's the point. You're buying information cheaply. When something does work, you'll know because the measurement is already in place, and you can move budget toward it with confidence rather than hope.
Marketing is one of the clearest levers in your growth function, but it rewards patience and measurement over big swings. Start with the foundations, fund demand-harvesting first, track everything you reasonably can, and let the results tell you where the next dollar goes.
About the author
Andrew Northcott
Founder & Chairman, Valont
Andrew is the founder and chairman of Valont and the parent group Wattlestone. He has spent two decades building and running Australian SMEs, and writes about the realities of ownership — cash, people, systems, and the decisions that compound.
LinkedIn →